The Imperial Charter established a monarchical constitutional

firoj3131

Representative government. The organization of power was characterized by centralization in the hands of the monarch, especially through the creation of a moderating power, exercised by the emperor, who had the prerogative to intervene in the Executive (which he also headed), the Legislative and the Judiciary, highlights Sarlet . The Charter of 1824, furthermore, despite a significant and, for the time, modern catalog of individual rights and guarantees, ended up endorsing and legitimizing the greatest wound in Brazilian history, namely the slave regime, which supported the economy and the domination of economic and political elites.

It was a semi-rigid constitution, since part of the text could be changed through the ordinary legislative procedure, highlighting, also, the absence of judicial control over the constitutionality of laws and the existence, in the constitutional catalog of rights, of some social elements, given the predominant influence of French constitutionalism", says the EX Mobile Phone Numbers constitutionalist. Lawyer Arnaldo Sampaio de Moraes Godoy , author of the book Law and History — a mistaken relationship (Edições Humanidades highlights that the Constitution of 1824 was "substantially liberal, strong in defending the right to property, so much so that the country had slave labor.



The slave was a "thing", not a "person". Therefore, it could be bought, sold, loaned, rented or mortgaged. The electoral process set out in the Constitution consisted of indirect elections, cites Godoy. In this way, so-called "active" citizens would elect provincial voters in parish assemblies, who, in turn, would choose the so-called representatives of the nation. The political model was centralized, says Godoy. "The provinces did not have autonomy or sovereignty and were governed by presidents, appointed by the emperor, who removed them when he saw fit, in the interest of the good of the State's service.